Share

The confidence of youth

Principal Advisor, Productivity Commission
3 October 2019

Young people have a strong belief that technology will shape their future but what types of skills and knowledge do young people think will be useful for a future world of work? Data from a 600+ survey of young people conducted by Young Enterprise (YES) shows that it’s largely the same skills and knowledge that they consider they’re currently strong in. This type of cognitive bias – a belief in self-efficacy – is however no bad thing. Optimism and confidence about the future and ones’ place in it can be self-fulfilling, helping people to persist even in the face of adversity. Image source: YES

What is YES? It’s a non-profit organisation that runs business challenges and start-up programmes, working with over 85% of New Zealand secondary schools every year. Recently they ran a survey of YES programme participants about their expectations of the future of work. They generously shared their data with us, and here are some of the results.

Young people expect the skills they are strongest in to be the ones most valuable for the future

Figures 1 and 2 show that of the top five skills identified as useful to do well, nearly all were skills that respondents thought they were currently strong in (either ‘very strong’ or ‘pretty solid’). This could be attributed to the confidence of youth, or to selection bias. The latter is because the types of skills imparted by YES to their programme participants include problem solving and leadership.

I was however intrigued by those who thought that cultural intelligence wouldn’t be useful to do well. In an increasingly multi-cultural and globalised world, as well as one that is getting better at recognising the value of diversity, cultural intelligence is argued to be a “critical leadership competency” (Rockstuhl et al, 2011).

Fig 1. What skills and areas of knowledge do you think will be useful for you to do well?What skills and areas of knowledge do you think will be useful for you to do well?Note: Digital literacy includes programming and coding.

Fig 2. What skills and/or knowledge areas do you think you’re currently strong in?What skills and/or knowledge areas do you think you’re currently strong in?

The same goes for characteristics

Self-efficacy was also apparent as regards characteristics. Figures 3 and 4 show that the top two characteristics participants thought would be most useful – resilience and initiative – are also the two that they consider they’re strongest in.

I was interested to see the mention of courage. It’s not a word that I often think about when it comes to the workplace, but perhaps it’s the contemporary version of self-confidence – something that, particularly as a woman, I’m very attuned to the effect of having (and demonstrating) in the workforce

Fig 3. What characteristics do you think will be useful to do well?What characteristics do you think will be useful to do well?

Fig 4. What characteristics do you think you’re currently strong in?What characteristics do you think you’re currently strong in?

Retraining isn’t on the cards

Figure 5 shows that the majority of respondents don’t predict they’ll need to retrain – showing a high degree of confidence in their current educational and other choices. This is particularly interesting when compared to Figure 6, where most predict that “some sectors will thrive [as a result of automation and new technology] while others will find it tough”.

There are lots of reasons why this could be the case. Respondents may be underestimating the nature of the change ahead, or conversely, they could be in tune with the main conclusion of our first draft report, namely that a lot of disruptive change is unlikely to be on the cards in the near future. Or, perhaps they have a remarkable degree of predictive accuracy regarding the success of the skills they have and how they’ll match to the future growth of particular sectors!

Another thing that I thought was interesting about Figure 5 is the substantial divergence of opinion between positive statements (like “there are lots of jobs out there – I just need to be flexible and brave”) and more negative statements (like “the future of work is uncertain. Changes to technology may mean there are fewer jobs and this worries me”). This could be the result of respondents having different views of their locus of control – this is the view about whether success is under your control, or whether it’s largely impacted by other factors. Research has shown that students with a more internal locus of control are more likely to view themselves as adaptable to the world of work (Duffy, 2010). It has also been shown to positively influence things like job satisfaction and job performance (Judge & Bono, 2001).

Fig 5. Expectations about the future of workExpectations about the future of work

Fig 6. How do you think New Zealand’s workforce will cope with automation and new technology?Automation and new technology

These results shouldn’t be extrapolated too widely, given the source of the data (ie, drawing from participants in YES’ programmes, rather than a statistically significant sample of young people). But they provide useful insights into young peoples’ expectations of, and confidence about, the future.

My key take-outs are that:

  • Self-efficacy is alive and well; and, as well as skills and knowledge, could be a useful belief to foster to enable resilience and adaptability to a changing future of work.
  • Better communication about the potential need for, and value of, learning over the course of one’s career may be needed.
  • Individual perceptions of locus of control are a relevant factor in the context of future career adaptability.

References
- Duffy, R.D. 2010. Sense of control and career adaptability among undergraduate students. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(4): 420-430.
- Judge, T. A. and Bono, J.E. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 80-92.
- Rocksthul, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. and Annen, H. 2011. Beyond General Intelligence (IQ) and Emotional Intelligence (EQ): The Role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) on Cross‐Border Leadership Effectiveness in a Globalized World. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4): 825-840.

Share

Have your say

Please tick the box to prove you're a human and help us stop spam.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments